Letos je zaradi porasta števila prometnih nesreč z najtežjimi posledicami ter dodatnega restriktivnega ravnanja policije - predvsem pri populaciji povprečnih prekrškarjev v slovenski blogosferi ogromno prekurjenih tipk na račun varnosti na slovenskih cestah. Mnenja so kot vedno deljena vsaj na 4 skupine.
1. tete in strici, ki ne glede na omejitev vozijo 40 km/h in se nagibajo k temu, da bi to bila najvišja dovoljena hitrost na slovenskih cestah.
2. apatična populacija ki je večinoma tiho in samo zmajuje z glavo
3. Povprečni vozniki, ki so razpeti med omejitve časa, nerealne hitrostne omejitve ter prikovani na slabe ceste, ki v osnovi trdijo, da policija nima jajc da bi ustavila resno nevarne dirkače (dokazano) in služi na račun te kategorije voznikov.
4. Dirkači ki so tudi večinsko tiho, če se pa že oglasijo pa seveda želijo popolno ukinitev vseh omejitev
Ker pa je vedno boljša preventiva kot kurativa (ki to dejansko ni) pa tokratni post namenjam simpatičnemu programu ki z osnovnimi pravili ustreznega obnašanja na sesti seznanja že najmlajše. Iskanje po internetu me je privedlo do simpatične strani Kolesarčki, kjer je predstavljen eden takih programov za najmlajše. Glede na to, da s tem kar počnem ne morem za izboljšanje prometne varnosti narediti nič, je najmanj kar lahko naredim to, da uvrstim to povezavo med svoje povezave in morda bo pritegnilo koga, ki se ga to dejansko tiče in ki lahko bolj aktivno pripomore k tovrstnim pobudam.
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Where is Slovenian president
Some days or maybe weeks ago Slovenians started to ask themselves where is our President, PhD. Drnovšek.
In the first half of his mandate 2002-2007 he was almost invisible and fighting his illness. After he recovered, he changed his attitude and become active as it is possible but with strongly humanitarian note. He get into fight with prime minister and government for several times (Slovenia is not presidential but parliamentary republic). Last activities were when he rejected political scandals over independence day celebration (another quarrel with government) in June 2007. In July 2007 he was still active until about July 15th and since then no news about him and also barely any news from his office. People started to wonder what is going on with him. From here on, I am writing pure speculations that should be more or less understood as political jokes but I will be glad that president himself will contact me with sufficient proof of identity and tell me that he thinks on us :)))
1. Only response of his office was in September 2007, when they said that he is on holiday. Could be true, but it is strange due the fact that he did not accept Italian prime minister Romano Prodi who seems to be his personal friend.
2. His illness may get worse again and he is at hospital - but media could find that in the moment.
3. Hes is dead - no he is not - we have democracy and he is not big fish that anyone should hide his death.
4. He is detained by prime minister Janez Janša - possible due to their previous disputes, and only government have enough power to hide such information form media. I doubt but if it is truth - we are living in fucked up democracy like USA - meaning Cuba and China are more free. So I doubt that he is imprisoned or assassinated by Slovenian political forces.
5. Electoral campaign for presidential election 2007 started and he refuses to intervene by supporting any of candidates so he moved away - it is possible and completely in sound with his new moral stand.
6. He changed his location and he lives in woods preparing his new book on meditation. Very likely.
What is the truth - I believe in combination of points 1, 5 and 6. He is removing himself from the politics, he doesn't want to influence electoral decision at the moment (maybe he will do it only few days before election) and he is preparing something more personal.
Mr. Drnovšek - what is your truth?
In the first half of his mandate 2002-2007 he was almost invisible and fighting his illness. After he recovered, he changed his attitude and become active as it is possible but with strongly humanitarian note. He get into fight with prime minister and government for several times (Slovenia is not presidential but parliamentary republic). Last activities were when he rejected political scandals over independence day celebration (another quarrel with government) in June 2007. In July 2007 he was still active until about July 15th and since then no news about him and also barely any news from his office. People started to wonder what is going on with him. From here on, I am writing pure speculations that should be more or less understood as political jokes but I will be glad that president himself will contact me with sufficient proof of identity and tell me that he thinks on us :)))
1. Only response of his office was in September 2007, when they said that he is on holiday. Could be true, but it is strange due the fact that he did not accept Italian prime minister Romano Prodi who seems to be his personal friend.
2. His illness may get worse again and he is at hospital - but media could find that in the moment.
3. Hes is dead - no he is not - we have democracy and he is not big fish that anyone should hide his death.
4. He is detained by prime minister Janez Janša - possible due to their previous disputes, and only government have enough power to hide such information form media. I doubt but if it is truth - we are living in fucked up democracy like USA - meaning Cuba and China are more free. So I doubt that he is imprisoned or assassinated by Slovenian political forces.
5. Electoral campaign for presidential election 2007 started and he refuses to intervene by supporting any of candidates so he moved away - it is possible and completely in sound with his new moral stand.
6. He changed his location and he lives in woods preparing his new book on meditation. Very likely.
What is the truth - I believe in combination of points 1, 5 and 6. He is removing himself from the politics, he doesn't want to influence electoral decision at the moment (maybe he will do it only few days before election) and he is preparing something more personal.
Mr. Drnovšek - what is your truth?
Saturday, September 15, 2007
cenzuriran komentar MoDov Blog - Opravičilo
Miha Wagner je 24. 8. 2007 na svojem blogu pustil sledeči zapis o homoseksualcih in otrocih. 15.9.2007 sem mu pustil komentar, ki pa je bil odstranjen, zato komentar v nespremenjeni obliki objavljam na svojem blogu.
Danes sem v debati z MoDom našel spoznanje, da dotični Miha komentarje objavlja šele po pregledu. Komentar se avtorju komentarja pojavi na zaslonu in izgleda kot objavljen, ob osvežitvi strani pa izgine. Ker ni nikjer novice o tem, da komentar čaka na uredniški pregled, sem zmotno mislil, da so bili komentarji črtani (kot kaže nisem bil niti edini). Danes pa je dotični na svojem blogu pojasnil zadevo in se mu seveda na podlagi razlage opravičujem za izjavo o cenzuri v želji po ohranjanju lastnega dobrega imena in pisanja resnice - v tistih okvirih kot so mi znani v določenem trenutku.
6. Glede na to da pod oknom kjer vpisujem komentar vidim sporočilo o prilaščanju komentarja te opozarjam, da sem avtor komentarja Harry in da lahko s svojim komentarjem počnem kar se zljubi meni ter da je vsak poseg v komentar poseg v moje avtorsko delo z vsemi posledicami, ki izhajajo iz zakona o avtorskih in sorodnih pravicah. Za vsak slučaj si bom pa komentar shranil, ker bi bilo škoda, da izgine v neznano zaradi morebitne cenzure.
Danes sem v debati z MoDom našel spoznanje, da dotični Miha komentarje objavlja šele po pregledu. Komentar se avtorju komentarja pojavi na zaslonu in izgleda kot objavljen, ob osvežitvi strani pa izgine. Ker ni nikjer novice o tem, da komentar čaka na uredniški pregled, sem zmotno mislil, da so bili komentarji črtani (kot kaže nisem bil niti edini). Danes pa je dotični na svojem blogu pojasnil zadevo in se mu seveda na podlagi razlage opravičujem za izjavo o cenzuri v želji po ohranjanju lastnega dobrega imena in pisanja resnice - v tistih okvirih kot so mi znani v določenem trenutku.
6. Glede na to da pod oknom kjer vpisujem komentar vidim sporočilo o prilaščanju komentarja te opozarjam, da sem avtor komentarja Harry in da lahko s svojim komentarjem počnem kar se zljubi meni ter da je vsak poseg v komentar poseg v moje avtorsko delo z vsemi posledicami, ki izhajajo iz zakona o avtorskih in sorodnih pravicah. Za vsak slučaj si bom pa komentar shranil, ker bi bilo škoda, da izgine v neznano zaradi morebitne cenzure.
Dost' mam
Zadnjih nekaj dni se je vleklo ko kurja čreva - o tem na kakšen način se bi dalo spraviti čreva iz kure nima smisla razpravljati pa vendar. Sedenje za računalnikom in mozganje o tem in onem ne pripelje prav daleč. Vse velike aktivnosti bom zadržal zase, dokler ne bo primeren trenutek. Vsekakor pa tudi po zadnji delovni akciji - dokončno mi je uspelo prevesti cca 200 strani lastnih nebuloz v angleščino - bogi tisti ki bo to lektoriral. Vsekakor upam, da se izide vse po načrtu - in to po prvotnem in ne zasilnem.
Na mizi imam že drug šop ničvrednega papirja, ki vsaj ne zahteva prevoda ampak samo temeljito popravo in dopolnitev, ampak tudi to naj ostane skrivnost kaj je v igri. Me pa zanima kje so skrajne meje mojega početja.
Trenutno se začenja prijava in priprava referatov za novo sezono konferenc in ponovno nimam pametne finančne rešitve, v okviru katere bi lahko organiziral kak pameten posvet. Največji problem praktično prostih strelcev je, da nihče ni pripravljen finančno kriti njegovih idej - oziroma skoraj nihče.
V preteklih letih me je že podprlo nekaj podjetij in nekaj občin, žal mi ni nihče od njih potem povedal ali sem z izdelkom upravičil njihovo zaupanje.
Trenutno sem propadel s prijavo na razpis Slovenske raziskovalne agencije ker v raziskovalni sferi vlada en lep začaran krog, skozi katerega je praktično nemogoče. Potrebujem t.i. šifro raziskovalca, ki jo dodeljuje dotična agencija (ARRS). Za šifro raziskovalca lahko zaprosim kot samostojni raziskovalec (pogoji za to so tako neživljenjski, da niti pod razno na začetku raziskovalne poti ni mogoče, da bi tovrstna prijava uspela- ker je več stroškov kot lahko dobiš sredstev), druga opcija je, da zaprosi raziskovalna institucija. Raziskovalna institucija tega ne naredi če raziskovalec ni zaposlen v okviru te institucije na kakem projektu, projekta pa ne more prijaviti ker nima šifre raziskovalca. In potem se nekaj časa ARRS in raziskovalna institucija igrajo ping pong, dokler ne zamudiš roka, izgubiš živcev ali pa dobiš kako čudežno opcijo. Letos sem že drugo leto šel čez ta ping pong in edino nekatere spremembe odnosa dajejo upanje na uspešnejši tretji poskus.
Ma ja včasih je pa potrebno tudi depresijo zganjat - grem popravljat podatke o občinskih financah.
Na mizi imam že drug šop ničvrednega papirja, ki vsaj ne zahteva prevoda ampak samo temeljito popravo in dopolnitev, ampak tudi to naj ostane skrivnost kaj je v igri. Me pa zanima kje so skrajne meje mojega početja.
Trenutno se začenja prijava in priprava referatov za novo sezono konferenc in ponovno nimam pametne finančne rešitve, v okviru katere bi lahko organiziral kak pameten posvet. Največji problem praktično prostih strelcev je, da nihče ni pripravljen finančno kriti njegovih idej - oziroma skoraj nihče.
V preteklih letih me je že podprlo nekaj podjetij in nekaj občin, žal mi ni nihče od njih potem povedal ali sem z izdelkom upravičil njihovo zaupanje.
Trenutno sem propadel s prijavo na razpis Slovenske raziskovalne agencije ker v raziskovalni sferi vlada en lep začaran krog, skozi katerega je praktično nemogoče. Potrebujem t.i. šifro raziskovalca, ki jo dodeljuje dotična agencija (ARRS). Za šifro raziskovalca lahko zaprosim kot samostojni raziskovalec (pogoji za to so tako neživljenjski, da niti pod razno na začetku raziskovalne poti ni mogoče, da bi tovrstna prijava uspela- ker je več stroškov kot lahko dobiš sredstev), druga opcija je, da zaprosi raziskovalna institucija. Raziskovalna institucija tega ne naredi če raziskovalec ni zaposlen v okviru te institucije na kakem projektu, projekta pa ne more prijaviti ker nima šifre raziskovalca. In potem se nekaj časa ARRS in raziskovalna institucija igrajo ping pong, dokler ne zamudiš roka, izgubiš živcev ali pa dobiš kako čudežno opcijo. Letos sem že drugo leto šel čez ta ping pong in edino nekatere spremembe odnosa dajejo upanje na uspešnejši tretji poskus.
Ma ja včasih je pa potrebno tudi depresijo zganjat - grem popravljat podatke o občinskih financah.
Friday, September 14, 2007
Presidential election in Slovenia - part II
This year we are facing presidential election again. Slovenia has democratic presidential election every 5 years where passive and active electoral right goes to all Slovenian citizens of age (18 years).
Passive right (right to be elected for the president) goes to all persons who are able to collect 5000 letters of support evident at administrative units. Exception is that someone could enter the official campaign also by collecting three signatures of MPs and 3000 signatures (letters of support form people) or he/she can be supported by political party (this option is not often in Slovenia because all candidates prefer to be above political parties - despite it is clear which party support individual candidates).
Each presidential campaign we also get one or two "lunatics" and number of self-promoters. However, in 2007 we are facing at least double trouble (next to the some unknown private managers who are probably known in local environment and who drop off even before they start). Both are smart but they have different strategies. First is young (about 24) Matej Sedmak self proclaimed peacehiker who traveled the world without money who started his campaign as some enlightened philosopher - but in fact he is selling his books, courses and himself in general. He is riding the opportunity to get some publicity for his regular activity. At the moment he is short of about 4800 signatures (two months to election).
Second one is middle aged PhD and excentric thinker Artur Štern. He started campaign as a show and lead it as an show. He was making scandals in the row. His campaign was under motto "naked truth" and he brought striptease girl (she was famous from Slovenian Big Brother show that finished about 4 months ago) to get naked at press conference, he was releasing video with distant look of sexual intercourse with the same girl, he was playing some karate tricks at press conferences, selling his letters of support at capital streets dressed only in the towel. However, he was smart and provocative. However, he was sticking to the rules of electoral campaign in general. In last days he removed himself from the campaign and called for last press conference. And told "naked truth" with small team he was preparing the experiment movie with hidden cameras how people react to such campaigning and how stupid and unfair electoral rules for presidential campaign are. He practically showed how any clown can start for presidential campaign and how impossible it is that any one can really enter official campaign without party support (Šteren in fact collected only 146 signatures), All other candidates who already qualified have formal or informal support of one or more political parties.
Despite, many people are angry with Štern experiment when he told the truth, I only hope that the movie will be fun.
Passive right (right to be elected for the president) goes to all persons who are able to collect 5000 letters of support evident at administrative units. Exception is that someone could enter the official campaign also by collecting three signatures of MPs and 3000 signatures (letters of support form people) or he/she can be supported by political party (this option is not often in Slovenia because all candidates prefer to be above political parties - despite it is clear which party support individual candidates).
Each presidential campaign we also get one or two "lunatics" and number of self-promoters. However, in 2007 we are facing at least double trouble (next to the some unknown private managers who are probably known in local environment and who drop off even before they start). Both are smart but they have different strategies. First is young (about 24) Matej Sedmak self proclaimed peacehiker who traveled the world without money who started his campaign as some enlightened philosopher - but in fact he is selling his books, courses and himself in general. He is riding the opportunity to get some publicity for his regular activity. At the moment he is short of about 4800 signatures (two months to election).
Second one is middle aged PhD and excentric thinker Artur Štern. He started campaign as a show and lead it as an show. He was making scandals in the row. His campaign was under motto "naked truth" and he brought striptease girl (she was famous from Slovenian Big Brother show that finished about 4 months ago) to get naked at press conference, he was releasing video with distant look of sexual intercourse with the same girl, he was playing some karate tricks at press conferences, selling his letters of support at capital streets dressed only in the towel. However, he was smart and provocative. However, he was sticking to the rules of electoral campaign in general. In last days he removed himself from the campaign and called for last press conference. And told "naked truth" with small team he was preparing the experiment movie with hidden cameras how people react to such campaigning and how stupid and unfair electoral rules for presidential campaign are. He practically showed how any clown can start for presidential campaign and how impossible it is that any one can really enter official campaign without party support (Šteren in fact collected only 146 signatures), All other candidates who already qualified have formal or informal support of one or more political parties.
Despite, many people are angry with Štern experiment when he told the truth, I only hope that the movie will be fun.
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
GRIMS - nima pojma o zasebnih šolah
Grims ponovno grmi tam kjer se ga sicer sliši ampak ponovno dokazuje da nima pojma o zasebnem in javnem šolstvu. Dokazano. Niti pod razno ne pozna razlike med javnim in zasebnim šolstvom ali pa namerno zavaja javnost.
Iz drugega posnetka novinaske konference, ko govori o tem zakaj in kako financirati javno in zasebno šolstvo pri tem pa izpostavlja, da se v primeru zasebnega šolstva financira samo program (znanje in pedagoge) ne pa investicij. Torej ali ni delež financiranja investicij zanemarljiv v primerjavi z investicijo v ustrezno kakovostne kadre. Pri tem se sklicuje, da Slovenija zaostaja po deležu zasebnega šolstva za razvitim svetom. Pozablja pa, da v razvitem svetu zasebno šolstvo pomeni to, da se ravno znanje financira iz zasebnih sredstev. Edini element, kjer lahko zasebne šole pridejo do javnih sredstev so razpisi za raziskave. Plače pedagogov pa so pokrite iz šolnin (ki so nesramno visoke) in zasebnega kapitala (navadno kakih pokroviteljskih institucij ali pa raziskovalnih projektov za znanega naročnika). Država niti pod razno nebi smela plačevati zasebnih šol v nobenem obsegu temveč bi morala skrbeti, da javne šole zagotavljajo ustrezno raven znanja. Da temu ni tako, in da država (oziroma trenutna politična opcija) z davkoplačevalskim denarjem financira zasebne šole kaže porast števila zasebnih šol od leta 2004 - namreč nemogoče je verjeti, da smo ravno v zadnjih treh letih pridobili toliko močnih financerjev za vsaj 5 novih kvazi zasebnih visokih šol in fakultet. In seveda Grims pozabi povedati, da je potem davkoplačevalec iz čigar žepa je šel denar za plačevanje tudi kvazi zasebnih šol dolžan tisti šoli plačati še bistveno višje stroške šolanja svojega potomca kot v primeru javne šole, ki zaradi preusmeritve financ išče sredstva za lastni obstoj na trgu, čeprav bi morala zanjo kot za javno šolo bistveno bolje skrbeti država. Pri tem pa se je Grims do sedaj izobraževal na javnih šolah. Morda bo edino doktorat naredil na kaki zasebni šoli, ker bo lažje plačal kot napisal to kar je obljubljal že nekje leta 2004 pred volitvami.
Iz drugega posnetka novinaske konference, ko govori o tem zakaj in kako financirati javno in zasebno šolstvo pri tem pa izpostavlja, da se v primeru zasebnega šolstva financira samo program (znanje in pedagoge) ne pa investicij. Torej ali ni delež financiranja investicij zanemarljiv v primerjavi z investicijo v ustrezno kakovostne kadre. Pri tem se sklicuje, da Slovenija zaostaja po deležu zasebnega šolstva za razvitim svetom. Pozablja pa, da v razvitem svetu zasebno šolstvo pomeni to, da se ravno znanje financira iz zasebnih sredstev. Edini element, kjer lahko zasebne šole pridejo do javnih sredstev so razpisi za raziskave. Plače pedagogov pa so pokrite iz šolnin (ki so nesramno visoke) in zasebnega kapitala (navadno kakih pokroviteljskih institucij ali pa raziskovalnih projektov za znanega naročnika). Država niti pod razno nebi smela plačevati zasebnih šol v nobenem obsegu temveč bi morala skrbeti, da javne šole zagotavljajo ustrezno raven znanja. Da temu ni tako, in da država (oziroma trenutna politična opcija) z davkoplačevalskim denarjem financira zasebne šole kaže porast števila zasebnih šol od leta 2004 - namreč nemogoče je verjeti, da smo ravno v zadnjih treh letih pridobili toliko močnih financerjev za vsaj 5 novih kvazi zasebnih visokih šol in fakultet. In seveda Grims pozabi povedati, da je potem davkoplačevalec iz čigar žepa je šel denar za plačevanje tudi kvazi zasebnih šol dolžan tisti šoli plačati še bistveno višje stroške šolanja svojega potomca kot v primeru javne šole, ki zaradi preusmeritve financ išče sredstva za lastni obstoj na trgu, čeprav bi morala zanjo kot za javno šolo bistveno bolje skrbeti država. Pri tem pa se je Grims do sedaj izobraževal na javnih šolah. Morda bo edino doktorat naredil na kaki zasebni šoli, ker bo lažje plačal kot napisal to kar je obljubljal že nekje leta 2004 pred volitvami.
Sunday, September 9, 2007
Sprenevedanje brez primere
Precej pogosto pišem o neumnostih na naših cestah. In ravno nekaj dni nazaj sem objavil posnetek rdečega audija ki je lepo odpeljal v rdečo na semaforju. Nova nesreča s smrtnim izidom se je zgodila v Ljubljani. Novinar v članku zapiše da je razlog previsoka hitrost. In v prispevku navede sledeča dejstva: kolesar pri rdeči prečka cesto. Avtomobilist z visoko hitrostjo pripelje in zbije kolesarja ter pobegne. Kaj je narobe - vse. Predvsem to, da je avtomobilist po nesreči pobegnil (z moralno etičnega vidika). Kaj je laž - to, da je za nesrečo kriva previsoka hitrost. V kolikor bi kolesar upošteval svojo rdečo luč do nesreče nebi prišlo v nobenem primeru.
Torej kdo je bolj kriv za smrt kolesarja - kolesar sam - ker je šel v lastno rdečo, kar definitivno pomeni, da je avtomobilist imel zeleno luč in posledično prosto pot - ne glede na hitrost s katero jo je prevozil. Dovolj dolgo časa sem bil precej na kolesu, da mi je jasno kaj so osnovna pravila, ki kolesarju omogočijo preživetje na cesti (spoštovanje pravila prednosti in nakazovanje spremembe smeri vožnje). Živela ljudska neumnost.
Kaj je s samim poročilom o nesreči - gre za kampanjo proti prehitri vožnji in je popolnoma nepomembno kako hitro je pripeljal nekdo če je peljal v lastno zeleno.
Torej kdo je bolj kriv za smrt kolesarja - kolesar sam - ker je šel v lastno rdečo, kar definitivno pomeni, da je avtomobilist imel zeleno luč in posledično prosto pot - ne glede na hitrost s katero jo je prevozil. Dovolj dolgo časa sem bil precej na kolesu, da mi je jasno kaj so osnovna pravila, ki kolesarju omogočijo preživetje na cesti (spoštovanje pravila prednosti in nakazovanje spremembe smeri vožnje). Živela ljudska neumnost.
Kaj je s samim poročilom o nesreči - gre za kampanjo proti prehitri vožnji in je popolnoma nepomembno kako hitro je pripeljal nekdo če je peljal v lastno zeleno.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
